I also got angry when
reading this article when it told stories of how teachers were “reprimanded”
for reading books about the different types of families that exist in the
world. My mind was blown when reading about how “seven-year-old Marcus was sent
to the principal’s office and assigned in-school suspension for using the word “gay”
in school.” (95) Marcus was not using the word in a negative manner, but was
instead telling another student about his family. Punishing Marcus for using
this language portrays being gay in a negative manner and also makes Marcus
think that something is wrong with his family.
I think this article is very important and
that anyone who is considering a career in teaching should read it. Learning
different strategies of handling the use of anti-LGBT language in the classroom
will be very useful when we are in our own classrooms one day. I feel that our
generation will be the ones to change how our society thinks. When we become
teachers, I think that we will feel comfortable with discussing certain topics,
such as race or sexual orientation, because we have grown up in a diverse
world.
Talking Point: While
reading both August and Rodriguez’s articles, I thought of the SCWAAMP activity
that we did in class and how they relate to straightness, whiteness, and
American-ness. It made me think of how the people with power usually fall into
more than one of these categories. Do you think that our generation will be
more accepting and welcoming to those who are not seen to have the “privilege
of power?” Will people still have to give up or hide a part of them that does
not fit in with mainstream society?